Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Entous results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 464 hits . Analysis detected 3,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,381 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,936 of 6,628 authors). This Adam Entous is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Adam Entous
Author details
Total words: 3,381
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.8% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 11.9% 11.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.7%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst