Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Madison Savedra results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 1,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,838 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,348 authors). This Madison Savedra is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Madison Savedra
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Madison Savedra (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,838
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate