95 Apartments Could Replace Commercial Building Next To Uptown’s Chase Park 11%

By Madison Savedra0%

7/17/2026, 12:58:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 283 faulty-reasoning hits from 346 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.3% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,040 of 21,175 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the article peer group.

UPTOWN  A six-story apartment complex could replace a commercial building next to a popular Uptown park. 
Raftery Construction is asking Ald. 
Matt Martin (47th) for a zoning change to build a six-story building with 95 apartments and 7,600 square feet of commercial space at 4730 N. 
Clark St. 
The building would have 20 one-bedroom, 70 two-bedroom and five three-bedroom apartments, according to plans shared by Martin’s office. 
There would also be 40 off-street parking spaces and 95 bike parking spots. 
Nineteen apartments would be earmarked as affordable apartments for people earning less than 60 percent of the area median income  or $51,060 for a household of one  as mandated by the city’s Affordable Requirement Ordinance . 
Because the development site borders Chase Park, 4701 N. 
Ashland Ave., to the north, the developer would also work with the Park District to convert the south portion of the east-west alley into publicly accessible green space, according to Martin’s office. 
The building that would be replaced by the six-story development sits next to Chase Park. 
A portion of the alley (pictured) would be turned into public space under the plans. 
Credit: Google Maps 
There’s a two-story commercial building on the site that used to be a location of Community Counseling Centers of Chicago, but it’s now closed, according to the Counseling Centers website. 
Raftery Construction has applied for a demolition permit to tear down that building, but it hasn’t been granted yet, according to city records. 
Neighbors can give Martin’s office feedback on the project online . 
The zoning change request will then be considered by the 47th Ward’s Zoning Advisory Council in August, according to his office. 
After that, the 47th Ward will schedule a community meeting for the proposal. 
Uptown’s stretch of Clark Street has seen a development boom in recent years , with hundreds of new apartments coming to the corridor. 
Across the street from Chase Park, a new construction building known as The Anderson recently brought 36 apartments to the neighborhood. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.3%Madison Savedra: 0.5%Block Club Chicago: 1.9%Confirmation Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Madison Savedra: 3.1%Block Club Chicago: 2.6%Availability Heuristic6.6%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 1.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 1.2%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.8%Block Club Chicago: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Madison Savedra: 2.1%Block Club Chicago: 3.1%Framing Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 11.0%Madison Savedra: 1.9%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Status Quo Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 5.2%Block Club Chicago: 4.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.4%Block Club Chicago: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Madison Savedra: 2.9%Block Club Chicago: 5.4%Negativity Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.6%Block Club Chicago: 3.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Madison Savedra: 2.5%Block Club Chicago: 1.2%Recency Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 29.5%Madison Savedra: 4.5%Block Club Chicago: 2.2%Appeal to Authority29.5%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.6%Madison Savedra: 0.8%Block Club Chicago: 2.5%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 2.3%Block Club Chicago: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.1%Madison Savedra: 1.2%Block Club Chicago: 2.6%Anecdotal6.1%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 2.4%Block Club Chicago: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.7%Block Club Chicago: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 1.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.6%Block Club Chicago: 1.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.8%Block Club Chicago: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

346 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker8.7%attributed speech316writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRaftery Construction • 5 words • 0.0% coverageRaftery Construction • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Raftery Construction

0%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words100% of attributed speech76% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.