Rogers Park’s Historic 400 Theater, Closed Since 2023, Reopening This Month Under New Owner 17%

By Madison Savedra0%

7/22/2026, 7:23:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 612 faulty-reasoning hits from 600 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (18,283 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the article peer group.

ROGERS PARK  After a three-year closure, Rogers Park’s New 400 Theater is reopening this month under a new owner who is reviving Chicago’s oldest movie palace. 
The 400 Theater, 6746 N. 
Sheridan Road, is opening July 31, the business announced Tuesday. 
The first movies to be shown at the theater include “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” and “I Want Your Sex,” both of which have July 31 premieres, according to a Facebook post from the theater . 
Tickets for those screenings and others will be on sale in person and on its website around July 27, the business said. 
The ticket prices, plus a $1.50 fee for buying online and tax, will be: 
$11 for evening shows 
$8.50 for afternoon shows 
$6 for children 11 years and younger 
Theater owner Jordan Stancil announced last year he was taking on the shuttered New 400 Theaters and planned to reopen as The 400 Theater, Block Club previously reported . 
Stancil is the operator of three movie houses in Michigan, including the Rialto Theater in Grayling, Michigan, which his family has owned since 1915, he said previously. 
The New 400 closed in 2023 , ending a 111-year-run that made it the oldest movie theater in the city and one of its last independent cinemas. 
Its former owner, who also owns the retail strip the theater occupies, said at the time he would look to find a new operator for the theater, but the space sat dormant since its closure. 
Stancil told Block Club in December he was looking forward to reviving the movie house and planned to bring new projection technology and a diverse range of programs. 
“What I really care about a lot is the movie theater experience for the people watching the movie,” he said previously. 
“There shouldn’t be any compromise for your moviegoing experience when you go to The 400 Theater.” 
The theater will have about five new releases a month along with around 30 other titles, according to an FAQ from the theater. 
There will also be reserved seating, and, eventually, alcohol will be served. 
The New 400 Theaters closed in 2023 after a 111-year run. 
Credit: Facebook/The New 400 Theaters 
Built in 1912, the ornate building was home to a theater and movie house for 111 years, showcasing everything from vaudeville to first-runs of the latest releases. 
Throughout its history , the theater has been known as Regent Theater and the 400 Theater, with “400” being a reference to catering to the most upper-crust crowds. 
The name remained for over 65 years and, in 2009, it became The New 400. 
Tony Fox bought the retail building housing the New 400 in 2007. 
He took over operation of the theater in 2009, after its then-owner stopped paying rent for more than a year. 
The pandemic caused serious issues for the theater, and it pivoted to stay afloat by offering private theater rentals, selling concessions on its patio and by operating as a coronavirus testing center . 
The New 400 reopened in 2021, having survived two global pandemics a century apart . 
But business never rebounded from the pandemic, Fox told Block Club previously. 
In March 2023, the Loyola Phoenix student newspaper broke the news the theater was likely to close. 
Fans flocked to the theater in an effort to keep the lights on. 
The Silent Film Society of Chicago hosted screenings of silent horror films and donated the majority of ticket proceeds to the 400 to try to keep it going, but it wasn’t enough. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.5%Block Club Chicago: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Madison Savedra: 3.1%Block Club Chicago: 2.5%Availability Heuristic7.0%This article: 4.5%Madison Savedra: 1.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic4.5%This article: 5.8%Madison Savedra: 1.2%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Hindsight Bias5.8%This article: 3.8%Madison Savedra: 0.8%Block Club Chicago: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias3.8%This article: 7.0%Madison Savedra: 2.1%Block Club Chicago: 3.1%Framing Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.5%Madison Savedra: 1.9%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Status Quo Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.7%Madison Savedra: 5.2%Block Club Chicago: 4.4%Optimism Bias13.7%This article: 2.0%Madison Savedra: 0.4%Block Club Chicago: 0.7%Pessimism Bias2.0%This article: 9.8%Madison Savedra: 2.9%Block Club Chicago: 5.4%Negativity Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 1.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Madison Savedra: 0.6%Block Club Chicago: 3.4%Halo Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.7%Madison Savedra: 2.5%Block Club Chicago: 1.2%Recency Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.5%Madison Savedra: 4.5%Block Club Chicago: 2.4%Appeal to Authority4.5%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.8%Block Club Chicago: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.8%Madison Savedra: 2.3%Block Club Chicago: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.8%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.2%Madison Savedra: 1.2%Block Club Chicago: 2.6%Anecdotal2.2%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.2%Madison Savedra: 2.4%Block Club Chicago: 1.3%Unattributed Quote11.2%This article: 3.5%Madison Savedra: 0.7%Block Club Chicago: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection3.5%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.7%Madison Savedra: 0.6%Block Club Chicago: 1.1%Indoctrination2.7%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison Savedra: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Madison Savedra: 0.8%Block Club Chicago: 3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.7%

600 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers33%attributed speech400writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageFacebook post from the theater • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Stancil • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Stancil • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Stancil • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Stancil • 21 words • 100.0% coverageJordan Stancil • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageFox told Block Club previously • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSilent Film Society of Chicago • 32 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words16% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Silent Film Society of Chicago: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Silent Film Society of Chicago: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.