Keyword summary
28% 2 analyzed articles/videos 532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago History results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 317 hits . Analysis detected 2,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,396 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,215 of 37,536 keywords). This Chicago History is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Chicago History
Keyword details
Total words: 3,396
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst