Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lucas Hellberg results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 394 hits . Analysis detected 1,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,307 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,611 authors). This Lucas Hellberg is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Lucas Hellberg
Author details
Total words: 2,307
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 17.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.5% No True Scotsman: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst