Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lisa Halverstadt results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Framing Effect, and Hindsight Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 409 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,258 authors). This Lisa Halverstadt is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Lisa Halverstadt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Lisa Halverstadt (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,104
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.1%2.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 3.5%3.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos