Author summary
44%3 analyzed articles/videos633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Levi Rickert results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 469 hits. Analysis detected 1,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,902 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,823 of 8,332 authors). This Levi Rickert is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Levi Rickert
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
55%Levi Rickert (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,902
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Straw Man: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate