Author summary
44% 3 analyzed articles/videos 633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Levi Rickert results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 469 hits . Analysis detected 1,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,902 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,823 of 8,332 authors). This Levi Rickert is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group. Levi Rickert
Author details
Total words: 3,902
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Straw Man: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst