Publication summary
64% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Native News Online results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 887 hits . Analysis detected 4,422 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,302 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 61% (218 of 546 publications). This Native News Online is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 8,302
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 9.3% 9.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst