Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Simonetti results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 630 hits. Analysis detected 4,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,766 of 6,387 authors). This Lauren Simonetti is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Lauren Simonetti
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
57%Lauren Simonetti (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,336
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos