Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Simonetti results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 630 hits . Analysis detected 4,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,766 of 6,387 authors). This Lauren Simonetti is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Lauren Simonetti
Author details
Total words: 5,336
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst