Author summary
23%1 analyzed article/video1,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Contreras results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Framing Effect, and Slippery Slope, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 439 hits. Analysis detected 1,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 27% (6,806 of 9,220 authors). This Lauren Contreras is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Lauren Contreras
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
27%Lauren Contreras (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,364
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 10.1%10.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos