Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Pyatt results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 1,152 hits . Analysis detected 5,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,229 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of 97% (308 of 8,958 authors). This Kyle Pyatt is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Kyle Pyatt
Author details
Total words: 2,229
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.6% percentile 11.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 51.7% 51.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 44.7% 44.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 43.3% 43.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 15.7% 15.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 15.5% 15.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.6% 10.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Author 51.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 44.7%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 43.3%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 15.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst