Author summary
11%4 analyzed articles/videos4,595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Klingsporn results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 696 hits. Analysis detected 5,453 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,380 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (8,685 of 8,868 authors). This Katie Klingsporn is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
Katie Klingsporn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
3%Katie Klingsporn (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,380
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751002.1% percentile
0.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate