Author summary
82% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathryn Carley results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 828 hits . Analysis detected 5,370 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,294 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,944 of 8,814 authors). This Kathryn Carley is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Kathryn Carley
Author details
Total words: 5,294
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.6% 15.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 10.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst