Author summary
56% 2 analyzed articles/videos 409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Dario results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 182 hits . Analysis detected 1,559 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,636 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,266 of 9,118 authors). This Kate Dario is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Kate Dario
Author details
Total words: 1,636
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst