New state law will tighten NH’s landfill regulations 46%

By Kate Dario56%

7/31/2026, 12:45:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Sunk Cost Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 586 faulty-reasoning hits from 199 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (15,944 of 29,339 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the article peer group.

Gov. 
Kelly Ayotte signed a new law to tighten the state’s landfill regulations earlier this month, the culmination of a long-running effort by environmental activists to bring greater scrutiny to the process for opening or expanding landfills in New Hampshire. 
Ayotte held a ceremonial signing of the new law in Dalton Thursday, where locals have fought for years against a proposed Casella Waste Management landfill. 
“I said from day one that we would not let our North Country or any beautiful area of our state become a dumping ground for out-of-state trash,” Ayotte said in a press release. 
“With this new law, we’re giving communities a voice in the landfill siting process and protecting New Hampshire’s environment.” 
The new law creates a seven-person solid waste evaluation committee composed of state officials and governor appointees that will review proposed plans for new and expanded landfills. 
It also puts a moratorium in place for augmenting landfill capacity until at least July 1, 2027. 
This law follows numerous failed attempts from lawmakers to put stricter solid waste rules into place that give more weight to the environmental and public health impacts of new projects. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 34.7%Kate Dario: 8.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.9%Confirmation Bias34.7%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 5.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Kate Dario: 11.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 3.6%Framing Effect13.6%This article: 16.6%Kate Dario: 2.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Loss Aversion16.6%This article: 8.5%Kate Dario: 3.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.6%Status Quo Bias8.5%This article: 34.7%Kate Dario: 4.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect34.7%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.7%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 35.7%Kate Dario: 7.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 4.1%Negativity Bias35.7%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 2.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 2.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 2.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 4.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 1.9%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 12.6%Kate Dario: 1.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Primacy Effect12.6%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 4.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.7%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.1%Kate Dario: 5.4%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.5%Hasty Generalization15.1%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.6%Kate Dario: 7.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion16.6%This article: 9.5%Kate Dario: 3.3%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Begging the Question9.5%This article: 19.6%Kate Dario: 3.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.6%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.7%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.6%Kate Dario: 1.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.9%Anecdotal12.6%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.1%Kate Dario: 3.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.1%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 2.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 16.6%Kate Dario: 2.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection16.6%This article: 4.0%Kate Dario: 1.9%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.0%Biased Writer Voice4.0%This article: 9.5%Kate Dario: 1.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%Indoctrination9.5%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Dario: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 19.6%Kate Dario: 2.4%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…19.6%

199 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers46%attributed speech108writer words
Selected voice

Gov. Kelly Ayotte

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words43% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Gov. Kelly Ayotte: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.4 ptsWriter: 7.4%Gov. Kelly Ayotte: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.