Topic summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Hampshire Politics results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 891 faulty-reasoning hits from 796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,078 of 23,563 topics). This New Hampshire Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
New Hampshire Politics
Topic details
Total words: 796
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510086.9% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles796 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.0%19.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.4%12.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 7.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos