Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kai Wright results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.3% saturation with 322 hits . Analysis detected 2,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 534 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.2% and a BS Rank of 99% (94 of 6,628 authors). This Kai Wright is worse (more manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Kai Wright
Author details
Total words: 534
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.6% percentile 18.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles534 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 50.2% 50.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 40.8% 40.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 60.3% 60.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 46.6% 46.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 23.0% 23.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 19.5% 19.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 32.8% 32.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 19.1% 19.1% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Author 9.7% 9.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.8% 14.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 60.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 50.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 46.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 40.8%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 32.8%, sitewide 19.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 23.0%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 19.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 19.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 0.6% Anecdotal: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst