Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anabel Bacon results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 66.5% saturation with 322 hits . Analysis detected 1,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.3% and a BS Rank of 100% (49 of 6,628 authors). This Anabel Bacon is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Anabel Bacon
Author details
Total words: 484
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.3% percentile 22.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles484 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 51.9% 51.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 45.0% 45.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 66.5% 66.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 51.5% 51.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 25.4% 25.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 21.5% 21.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 35.3% 35.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 21.1% 21.1% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Author 10.7% 10.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.9% 14.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 66.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 51.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 51.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 45.0%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 35.3%, sitewide 19.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 25.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 21.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 21.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 6.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 0.6% Anecdotal: Author 10.7%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst