Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carter Sherman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 64% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of 100% (18 of 6,628 authors). This Carter Sherman is worse (more manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Carter Sherman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Carter Sherman (selected)32%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

100% percentile
025507510099.7% percentile
31.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles50 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 64.0%64.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 34.0%34.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 34.0%34.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 34.0%34.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 14.0%14.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 64.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 34.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 34.0%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos