Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Bindel results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 1,248 hits. Analysis detected 7,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (624 of 6,628 authors). This Julie Bindel is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Julie Bindel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠91%Julie Bindel (selected)8%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510090.6% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 36.6%36.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 26.4%26.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 12.2%12.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.7%6.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 26.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Author 11.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos