Author summary
15% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,000 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JoVonne Wagner results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Middle Ground , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 178 hits . Analysis detected 1,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (7,358 of 8,270 authors). This JoVonne Wagner is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. JoVonne Wagner
Author details
Total words: 4,000
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Middle Ground: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst