EPA continues efforts to remove lead-contaminated soil in East Helena 10%

By JoVonne Wagner15%

7/28/2026, 3:12:03 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 363 faulty-reasoning hits from 570 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (22,760 of 25,181 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the article peer group.

Some East Helena properties will be excavated this week as part of the ongoing cleanup effort of the former smelter site, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. 
The EPA announced Monday that yard cleanups are needed to remove lead-contaminated soil. 
Properties within the East Helena Superfund boundaries with lead levels exceeding the EPA’s safe threshold qualify for remediation. 
The surrounding land and groundwater of the former American Smelting and Refining Company, or ASARCO, were contaminated during the smelting plant’s century-long run from the late 1800s to 2001. 
Since 2009, about 2,048 acres of the East Helena Superfund Site have been transferred to the Montana Environmental Trust Group. 
The trust group, the EPA and the city of East Helena have made strides in remediating the land, even turning portions of land into public spaces, including Prickly Pear Park . 
The EPA has remediated 1,500 properties in East Helena since 2024, including 700 residential yards and about 800 other locations such as schools, playgrounds and alleys. 
About 200 East Helena homes have been identified for the remaining decontamination , EPA Region 8 Administrator Cyrus Western told Montana Free Press Tuesday. 
About 200 East Helena properties were identified by the Environmental Protection Agency for lead-contaminated soil cleanup efforts this summer. 
Credit: JoVonne Wagner / Montana Free Press 
 One of the biggest pieces of criticism I think we get over the years is that we’re not moving fast enough, and quite frankly, that’s true,” Western said. 
“The East Helena site specifically is another example of us just saying, ‘Look, we know what we need to do. 
We’ve done the testing and analysis, we need to be reactive and get some of these yards cleaned up.’” 
Lead exposure and poisoning can result in health problems, especially in pregnant women, young children and infants, causing harm to the nervous system and brain, according to the World Health Organization . 
At the homes, EPA-contracted crews will dig 18 inches into the ground and remove the soil. 
The lead-filled soil will then be transported to the slag pile at the old smelter site, forming a base layer for a future protective cover, according to an EPA press release. 
Crews will then fill the yards back in with clean soil taken from neighboring communities and finish by adding sod or other ground cover that matches the yard’s previous appearance. 
In 2024, the East Helena Superfund site received $40 million from the federal government’s $1 billion Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which funded cleanup efforts at more than 100 sites across the country. 
Funding was intended to be used to remove the lead-contaminated soil, among other remediation efforts in the area. 
 This is part of our initiative and the administrator’s initiative to really make real tangible progress, right?” 
Western said. 
 Our number one priority is to deliver results. 
If you talk to folks in East Helena, and when I’ve talked to folks across Superfund sites across Montana and the region, they just want stuff to get done.” 
Western added that the East Helena soil cleanup project will last as long as the weather permits this season and is expected to occur every summer through 2031. 
In-depth, independent reporting on the stories impacting your community from reporters who know your town. 
The post EPA continues efforts to remove lead-contaminated soil in East Helena appeared first on Montana Free Press . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 1.1%Montana Free Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 1.7%Montana Free Press: 1.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.1%JoVonne Wagner: 0.7%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic5.1%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 1.3%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 3.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 1.9%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.8%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.6%JoVonne Wagner: 4.5%Montana Free Press: 1.5%Optimism Bias12.6%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 2.7%Montana Free Press: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%JoVonne Wagner: 0.8%Montana Free Press: 1.7%Negativity Bias5.6%This article: 6.7%JoVonne Wagner: 1.7%Montana Free Press: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias6.7%This article: 3.3%JoVonne Wagner: 0.5%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error3.3%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%JoVonne Wagner: 0.8%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Halo Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.7%Montana Free Press: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 2.5%Montana Free Press: 1.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 4.9%JoVonne Wagner: 0.7%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Slippery Slope4.9%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 2.4%Montana Free Press: 1.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.4%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.6%JoVonne Wagner: 1.7%Montana Free Press: 0.7%Appeal to Emotion5.6%This article: 3.2%JoVonne Wagner: 0.4%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Begging the Question3.2%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.9%Montana Free Press: 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.8%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.1%JoVonne Wagner: 0.7%Montana Free Press: 0.4%Anecdotal5.1%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.9%Montana Free Press: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 2.6%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.2%Montana Free Press: 0.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.5%JoVonne Wagner: 0.5%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.5%This article: 2.6%JoVonne Wagner: 0.8%Montana Free Press: 0.6%Biased Writer Voice2.6%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JoVonne Wagner: 0.4%Montana Free Press: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

570 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers42%attributed speech329writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words13% of attributed speech22% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%World Health Organization: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.