Author summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Cameron results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 207 hits . Analysis detected 1,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,833 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,233 of 6,244 authors). This Jim Cameron is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. Jim Cameron
Author details
Total words: 1,833
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst