Author summary
14%1 analyzed article/video522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JACQUES BILLEAUD Associated Press results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 858 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,934 of 9,136 authors). This JACQUES BILLEAUD Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
JACQUES BILLEAUD Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
36%JACQUES BILLEAUD Associated Press (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,088
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

35% percentile
025507510035.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos