Author summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video3,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Wilt results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 1.3% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 1,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (9,385 of 9,408 authors). This Jacob Wilt is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Jacob Wilt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠1%Jacob Wilt (selected)1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,960
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.2% percentile
0.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos