Author summary
2%1 analyzed article/video330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Armstrong results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 268 faulty-reasoning hits from 990 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,982 of 6,628 authors). This Jack Armstrong is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Jack Armstrong
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
40%Jack Armstrong (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 990
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510039.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles990 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.9%6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 2.5%2.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos