Author summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 1,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hardwick Gazette results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 404 hits . Analysis detected 3,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,480 of 6,628 authors). This Hardwick Gazette is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Hardwick Gazette
Author details
Total words: 3,600
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.6% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.2% 11.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst