Former Copley staffers create Green Mountain Birthing Center 51%

By Hardwick Gazette76%

7/17/2026, 8:41:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 2,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,200 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,835 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the article peer group.

Green Mountain Birthing Center is a new nonprofit organization in Waterbury. 
Photo via Hardwick Gazette 
This story by Raymonda Parchment was first published in the Hardwick Gazette on July 14, 2026. 
In the wake of the closure of Copley Hospital’s Birthing Center this past November, many of the nurse-midwives from the hospital have continued their efforts to provide perinatal care to area parents, with the establishment of the nonprofit organization Green Mountain Birthing Center. 
Advanced practice registered nurse, founder, president and co-executive director Erinn Mandeville, a former Copley employee, shared updates on the new center and the staff’s efforts to provide a third option, other than a hospital delivery or home birth, for area parents. 
Mandeville is a founding member of the Vermont Birth Center Coalition and has spent many years advocating for birth center legislation in Vermont. 
She is also the vice president of the Vermont affiliate of the American College of Nurse Midwives. 
“So ultimately, GMBC’s aim is to open Vermont’s first freestanding birth center in Waterbury. 
We are hoping to do this by 2028,” Mandeville revealed. 
The funds, as well as the requisite real estate, will take some time. 
Whether they purchase then renovate, or build new, is still to be determined. 
In the meantime, staff will begin to see patients in their Morrisville clinic, located at the WING center. 
Although not in the main body of the WING center, as it has a lot of other programming, the GMBC has a clinic with a separate entrance at the back side of the building. 
The center will be offering prenatal and postpartum care to people. 
“We won’t be catching babies at the WING center. 
We won’t be doing births quite yet,” Mandeville explained. 
“The idea is that people who are left without obstetric services in Lamoille County and the surrounding areas will be able to get care with us to save them the drive to Burlington or Central Vermont Medical Center or St. 
Johnsbury, wherever their birthplace of choice is.” 
The center can provide the majority of patients personalized care, Mandeville said, with the midwifery model as well as saving parents the drive. 
They are credentialed with Medicaid and three major private insurers at the moment, with others underway. 
The provided care includes but is not limited to OB-GYN care, like contraception, preventive care annual exams and general gynecological and reproductive midwifery care as well. 
A midwife for two decades, Mandeville was employed at Copley for five years, before the hospital closed its obstetric services and subsequently let all the staff go. 
She began as a home birth midwife, also working in freestanding birthing centers as well as high-volume hospitals in Boston. 
“I’m really excited. 
We realize that the birthing center won’t replace Copley. 
We are not a hospital. 
We won’t be offering C-sections. 
We will be taking low-risk patients. 
But I’m very excited that Vermonters will now have this third option. 
It’s an alternative to home or hospital. 
It’s the third option that Vermonters haven’t had access to yet.” 
However, Mandeville said there is much work to be done in the state to make maternity care accessible to all people and prevent hospital closures. 
Leadership at Brattleboro Memorial Hospital recently announced they would be closing the BMH birthing center due to financial challenges. 
U.S. 
Rep. 
Becca Balint, D-Vt., commented on the closure, saying, “The prospect of closing this resource in Brattleboro is heartbreaking for families across southern Vermont. 
Both of my kids were born at Brattleboro Memorial Hospital, and my family received exceptional care there, an experience every Vermont family deserves to have close to home. 
No one should have to travel farther or face more uncertainty to access safe, high-quality care during one of the most important moments of their lives. 
This is another painful reminder that our rural health care system is under enormous strain, and the reckless cuts Republicans are making to Medicaid will only make it harder for our rural hospitals to keep their doors open.” 
With Springfield Hospital’s birthing center closing in 2019, the next closest hospitals with birthing services are Cheshire Medical Center in Keene, New Hampshire, and Baystate Franklin Medical Center in Greenfield, Massachusetts. 
Copley Hospital cited similar reasons for closing its birthing center this past November, leaving patients in the Northeast Kingdom with the option to commute to either CVMC or UVM. 
“Birth centers are part of a robust and thorough maternity care sort of system, but they’re not the answer to these. 
They’re not going to replace these hospitals that are closing. 
I just want to make that point clear,” Mandeville said. 
The risks posed to area parents are serious and well documented. 
“We know that lack of prenatal care or increased distances, drives of 30 to 60 minutes or more, to access maternity care and/or birth services increases both the risk of complications and preterm labor  but the other thing that is sort of clear is that people who labor very quickly are at risk of not making it to their facility of choice to birth at.” 
Having accessible care that is within an hour, or ideally less, said Mandeville, generally improves outcomes and access. 
“We expect to see more complications, whether it’s from miscarriage or what we call precipitous births where the labor is three hours or less. 
We expect to see those things ending up in emergency rooms, and while those ER providers are amazing at what they do  we’re super, super grateful for them  they’re not the ideal candidates to be addressing obstetric emergencies.” 
Copley also ceased providing pediatric services alongside closing the birthing center operations. 
Mandeville hopes to address some of these issues by creating better access in the community. 
“So while we won’t be catching babies, we are offering care that is more local, that is the midwifery model. 
Mary Lou Kopas and myself, we’re both Copley midwives, so we’ll be familiar faces to people.” 
People will get a continuity of care with GMBC staffers, Mandeville said. 
The center will offer childbirth education and trimester-based classes so patients will be well informed, regardless of where they go to deliver. 
“One of our priorities is to have a smooth transition of what we call transfer of care. 
I work per diem at Central Vermont Medical Center currently, and Mary Lou works per diem at Gifford, St. 
Johnsbury and CVMC. 
 (W)e have been in conversation with those facilities to coordinate smooth transfer of care and make sure that all the data points that they will want and need get sent to them before the patient arrives.” 
Scheduling for Green Mountain Birthing Center can be done via an online form or the phone number listed on the website. 
In the future, self-scheduling will be available to patients. 
“We’ve got a lot of work to do in Vermont, but we’re excited that at the very least we’re able to kind of (fill) a little bit of the gap that Copley left, even though there won’t be babies born in birth centers or hospitals in Lamoille County,” Mandeville concluded. 
Read the story on VTDigger here: Former Copley staffers create Green Mountain Birthing Center . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.5%Hardwick Gazette: 1.8%VTDigger: 2.3%Confirmation Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 2.3%VTDigger: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Hardwick Gazette: 3.8%VTDigger: 2.7%Availability Heuristic6.8%This article: 3.9%Hardwick Gazette: 1.3%VTDigger: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.9%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Hardwick Gazette: 1.9%VTDigger: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias5.6%This article: 19.3%Hardwick Gazette: 6.4%VTDigger: 4.7%Framing Effect19.3%This article: 4.2%Hardwick Gazette: 1.4%VTDigger: 1.0%Loss Aversion4.2%This article: 0.9%Hardwick Gazette: 0.3%VTDigger: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.1%Hardwick Gazette: 11.2%VTDigger: 4.4%Optimism Bias13.1%This article: 5.1%Hardwick Gazette: 4.2%VTDigger: 2.5%Pessimism Bias5.1%This article: 11.5%Hardwick Gazette: 4.9%VTDigger: 5.1%Negativity Bias11.5%This article: 3.7%Hardwick Gazette: 2.0%VTDigger: 3.5%Self-Serving Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Hardwick Gazette: 4.9%VTDigger: 3.0%Halo Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 1.1%VTDigger: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.9%Hardwick Gazette: 6.9%VTDigger: 2.8%Appeal to Authority12.9%This article: 3.8%Hardwick Gazette: 1.5%VTDigger: 2.1%False Dilemma3.8%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.3%Hardwick Gazette: 2.5%VTDigger: 4.1%Hasty Generalization5.3%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.6%Hardwick Gazette: 7.3%VTDigger: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion10.6%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.8%Hardwick Gazette: 5.3%VTDigger: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.8%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.3%Hardwick Gazette: 2.3%VTDigger: 2.8%Anecdotal2.3%This article: 1.7%Hardwick Gazette: 0.6%VTDigger: 0.2%No True Scotsman1.7%This article: 16.5%Hardwick Gazette: 5.5%VTDigger: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.5%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.5%Hardwick Gazette: 1.8%VTDigger: 0.9%Unattributed Quote5.5%This article: 1.3%Hardwick Gazette: 1.1%VTDigger: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection1.3%This article: 1.4%Hardwick Gazette: 0.5%VTDigger: 2.4%Biased Writer Voice1.4%This article: 0.3%Hardwick Gazette: 0.1%VTDigger: 1.5%Indoctrination0.3%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 2.1%VTDigger: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hardwick Gazette: 0.0%VTDigger: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Hardwick Gazette: 3.2%VTDigger: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.5%

1200 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers50%attributed speech605writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 14 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 9 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 9 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 40 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 3 words • 100.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 9 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 5 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 5 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 6 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 12 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 7 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageBecca Balint • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBecca Balint • 28 words • 0.0% coverageBecca Balint • 26 words • 0.0% coverageBecca Balint • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 21 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 10 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 66 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 24 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 20 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 17 words • 100.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 19 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 3 words • 0.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageErinn Mandeville • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Becca Balint

100%flagged-word coverage
115 attributed words19% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.9 ptsWriter: 12.9%Becca Balint: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Becca Balint: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.