Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gregory Conti results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 987 hits. Analysis detected 2,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (1,127 of 6,628 authors). This Gregory Conti is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Gregory Conti
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠83%Gregory Conti (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,132
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510083.0% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 46.3%46.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 14.9%14.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 7.3%7.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 46.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Author 14.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Straw Man: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos

How Liberals Misread MAGA⁠71%
Compact⁠77%By Gregory Conti⁠0%6/22/2026, 11:00:09 AM