Author summary
85% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,063 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gersh Kuntzman results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 672 hits . Analysis detected 6,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,536 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,695 of 9,027 authors). This Gersh Kuntzman is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Gersh Kuntzman
Author details
Total words: 7,536
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst