Author summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George D. Rotsch results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 362 hits . Analysis detected 2,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,450 of 8,942 authors). This George D. Rotsch is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group. George D. Rotsch
Author details
Total words: 4,888
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Middle Ground: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst