Author summary
73% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gail O'Hara results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,344 hits . Analysis detected 9,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,763 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,679 of 9,265 authors). This Gail O'Hara is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Gail O'Hara
Author details
Total words: 10,763
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst