Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Halper results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 347 hits. Analysis detected 2,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,787 of 6,218 authors). This Evan Halper is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Evan Halper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
56%Evan Halper (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,408
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510055.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.4%14.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos