Author summary
63% 1 analyzed article/video 905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethan Andersen results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 344 hits . Analysis detected 2,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,455 of 8,985 authors). This Ethan Andersen is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Ethan Andersen
Author details
Total words: 3,620
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst