Author summary
6%2 analyzed articles/videos2,679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Enrique Saenz results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 2,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,716 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (9,391 of 9,471 authors). This Enrique Saenz is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Enrique Saenz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
1%Enrique Saenz (selected)1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,716
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751000.8% percentile
0.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos