Author summary
30% 1 analyzed article/video 462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cooper Worth results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 171 hits . Analysis detected 1,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,762 of 8,893 authors). This Cooper Worth is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Cooper Worth
Author details
Total words: 1,848
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.3%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst