Author summary
94%2 analyzed articles/videos639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris capper Liebenthal results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 894 hits. Analysis detected 4,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,556 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 87% (1,191 of 9,092 authors). This Chris capper Liebenthal is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Chris capper Liebenthal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
87%Chris capper Liebenthal (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,556
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510086.9% percentile
4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 35.0%35.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 21.5%21.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 16.2%16.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.9%2.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 35.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Author 21.5%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos