Wisconsin Lawmaker Calls For Fauci To Be Publicly Executed 61%

By Chris capper Liebenthal79%

7/31/2026, 2:53:51 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.6% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 765 faulty-reasoning hits from 291 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (11,294 of 28,846 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the article peer group.

Waukesha County Supervisor Robert Kolb made a Facebook post calling for the public execution of Dr. 
Anthony Fauci. 
When people started to call or send emails to him, he made another post saying, "I stated that Fauci should be executed for his crimes…. 
I guess these people think I am going to be upset & bothered by these phone calls. 
I couldn't be laughing any harder." 
Despite his bravado, Kolb deleted his original post. 
When TMJ3 reporter Rebecca Klopf called him about his posts, all Mr. 
Tough Guy would say was "no comment." 
The reporter then attempted to call all of the other county supervisors as well as the county executive. 
Of the people she was able to contact, most condemned Kolb's statement, but not one of them took any action to censure him. 
The county's lawyers said that Kolb did not violate any laws since he made the comments on a private account. 
That may or may not be accurate. 
It depends on when he made the comments, where he was when he made them, and what device he used. 
If he made those comments in the evening, with his own phone while in the comfort of his momma's basement, he's fine. 
But if he made those comments while he was on the clock, or while he was on county property, or if he used a county computer to prove that he was an idiot, well, that's a whole other story. 
Considering how many people had lost their jobs because of a social media post after Charlie Kirk's death, the fact that this asshat can make a threat on a person's life and not receive the slightest consequence is completely outrageous. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 3.4%Crooks and Liars: 7.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Chris capper Liebenthal: 6.9%Crooks and Liars: 2.7%Availability Heuristic13.7%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.5%Crooks and Liars: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.8%Crooks and Liars: 6.7%Framing Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.9%Chris capper Liebenthal: 2.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.2%Status Quo Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Chris capper Liebenthal: 1.9%Crooks and Liars: 1.1%Optimism Bias7.6%This article: 16.2%Chris capper Liebenthal: 4.0%Crooks and Liars: 2.1%Pessimism Bias16.2%This article: 33.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 17.9%Crooks and Liars: 20.2%Negativity Bias33.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 2.0%Crooks and Liars: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.6%Crooks and Liars: 2.3%Fundamental Attribution Error2.4%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 2.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 1.3%Crooks and Liars: 3.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Chris capper Liebenthal: 15.4%Crooks and Liars: 11.6%Ad Hominem2.4%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 3.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 3.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 3.4%Crooks and Liars: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 21.6%Chris capper Liebenthal: 12.3%Crooks and Liars: 10.3%Hasty Generalization21.6%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 1.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 40.5%Chris capper Liebenthal: 19.9%Crooks and Liars: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion40.5%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 1.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 13.7%Chris capper Liebenthal: 3.4%Crooks and Liars: 1.6%Burden of Proof13.7%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.7%Chris capper Liebenthal: 3.4%Crooks and Liars: 2.2%Anecdotal13.7%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.5%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.8%Chris capper Liebenthal: 4.0%Crooks and Liars: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.8%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 7.6%Chris capper Liebenthal: 1.9%Crooks and Liars: 0.7%Special Pleading7.6%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.2%Crooks and Liars: 3.7%Unattributed Quote0.7%This article: 5.5%Chris capper Liebenthal: 3.5%Crooks and Liars: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection5.5%This article: 43.6%Chris capper Liebenthal: 34.4%Crooks and Liars: 27.5%Biased Writer Voice43.6%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 3.4%Crooks and Liars: 11.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Chris capper Liebenthal: 3.4%Crooks and Liars: 1.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias13.7%This article: 0.0%Chris capper Liebenthal: 0.0%Crooks and Liars: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

291 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers27%attributed speech211writer words
Selected voice

Robert Kolb

100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words60% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.7 ptsWriter: 52.1%Robert Kolb: 35.4%35.4%Quote-first Misdirection+33.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Robert Kolb: 33.3%33.3%Politically Right Leaning -19.0 ptsWriter: 19.0%Robert Kolb: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+4.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Robert Kolb: 4.2%4.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.