Author summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine White results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 88 faulty-reasoning hits from 668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (2,404 of 9,017 authors). This Catherine White is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Catherine White
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Tabitha Mueller1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠74%Catherine White (selected)4%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 668
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

73% percentile
025507510073.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles668 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos