Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Carson Swick results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 421 hits . Analysis detected 1,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,421 authors). This Carson Swick is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Carson Swick
Author details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst