Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caitlin Flanagan results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , In-Group Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 236 hits . Analysis detected 1,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,248 of 6,628 authors). This Caitlin Flanagan is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Caitlin Flanagan
Author details
Total words: 1,224
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.2% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 19.3% 19.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Author 19.3%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Primacy Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst