The Indivisible America 50%

By Caitlin Flanagan0%

7/3/2026, 12:31:01 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 61.4% saturation with 188 hits. Analysis detected 755 faulty-reasoning hits from 306 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,120 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the article peer group.

I didn’t go to first grade in the United States; I was overseas on one of my academic father’s endless sabbaticals. 
I got home in time for the new school year, and I learned that in my absence, my cohort had been charged with a new obligation: saying the Pledge of Allegiance each morning. 
Nobody took me aside to tell me what it meant (Allegiance? 
Indivisible?); I just stood up with everyone else and picked it up. 
We took it seriously. 
When the morning bell rang, we’d climb the wide stone steps that led from the playgrounds to the school buildings, hang up our jackets and store our lunch boxes in the cloakroom (why cloak? 
Had that, too, been explained in first grade?), and then hustle over to our desks for duty. 
Each week there was a different Pledge of Allegiance monitor, and that person walked importantly to the front of the room and stand beneath the flag. 
The monitor’s hand was placed (more or less) over the monitor’s heart, a signal for all of us to look alive. 
A single clap rang out as 22 small hands clapped (more or less) over 22 hearts. 
The monitor started and we all joined in. 
We looked at the flag and said the Pledge, and it was similar to saying prayers you’ve learned by heart. 
Any single day might not have an effect, but day after day, the words soaked into me. 
They taught me that I was an American; that America was a good place; and that the flag—our flag—was to be respected. 
This wasn’t taking place in some deep red state; this was Berkeley, California, in 1968. 
All around us, in the city and the country, adults were losing their minds, but up there at Cragmont School, the children were holding it down. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 1.2%The FP: 5.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Caitlin Flanagan: 1.4%The FP: 4.1%Availability Heuristic5.6%This article: 4.9%Caitlin Flanagan: 1.2%The FP: 1.8%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 3.9%Caitlin Flanagan: 1.0%The FP: 1.5%Hindsight Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 22.2%Caitlin Flanagan: 7.0%The FP: 9.5%Framing Effect22.2%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.6%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.7%The FP: 0.5%Status Quo Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 1.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.4%Caitlin Flanagan: 8.1%The FP: 10.8%Negativity Bias15.4%This article: 6.9%Caitlin Flanagan: 1.7%The FP: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Caitlin Flanagan: 12.8%The FP: 1.9%In-Group Bias15.7%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Caitlin Flanagan: 3.9%The FP: 1.9%Halo Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 2.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Caitlin Flanagan: 4.2%The FP: 1.1%Primacy Effect11.1%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 2.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 1.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 2.1%The FP: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.9%Caitlin Flanagan: 1.2%The FP: 2.5%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 5.5%The FP: 8.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 6.0%The FP: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.2%Caitlin Flanagan: 3.9%The FP: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion7.2%This article: 7.2%Caitlin Flanagan: 1.8%The FP: 1.5%Begging the Question7.2%This article: 5.6%Caitlin Flanagan: 1.4%The FP: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.6%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 8.5%Caitlin Flanagan: 2.1%The FP: 0.4%Composition/Division8.5%This article: 12.4%Caitlin Flanagan: 3.1%The FP: 3.2%Anecdotal12.4%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.8%Caitlin Flanagan: 2.7%The FP: 2.5%Unattributed Quote10.8%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 61.4%Caitlin Flanagan: 17.7%The FP: 15.0%Biased Writer Voice61.4%This article: 27.1%Caitlin Flanagan: 19.3%The FP: 2.8%Indoctrination27.1%This article: 4.9%Caitlin Flanagan: 2.5%The FP: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Flanagan: 0.0%The FP: 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

306 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.