Author summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandi Vincent results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 465 hits . Analysis detected 3,287 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,182 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,640 of 8,437 authors). This Brandi Vincent is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Brandi Vincent
Author details
Total words: 6,182
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.4% 2.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst