Publication summary
32% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DefenseScoop results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,994 hits . Analysis detected 10,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,125 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (348 of 546 publications). This DefenseScoop is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 23,125
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.3% percentile 1.2% BS Score11 analyzed articles23.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Publication 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst