Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These BellaVita results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 264 hits . Analysis detected 1,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,890 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,359 authors). This BellaVita is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. BellaVita
Author details
Total words: 1,890
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.0% 14.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.8% 8.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 9.1% 9.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst