Author summary
3%1 analyzed article/video494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bella DeCrescenzo results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 424 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,293 of 8,669 authors). This Bella DeCrescenzo is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Bella DeCrescenzo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
16%Bella DeCrescenzo (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,976
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

16% percentile
025507510015.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.5%3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos