BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 313 faulty-reasoning hits from 494 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of 5% (25,719 of 26,881 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the article peer group.

NEWPORT  Swabs, freshmen of the U.S. 
Coast Guard Academy, stand at the helm of the Coast Guard cutter Eagle on Friday, July 31, as the Claiborne Pell Bridge looms overhead. 
Gripping the spokes of the ship’s three steering wheels, they work together to spin the wheels as fast as they can. 
The Eagle’s tallest mast, measuring 150 feet, clears the bridge as “America’s Tall Ship” sails into Newport’s Louis L. 
Jagschitz State Pier No. 9, where the ship will sit all weekend. 
Giving the Newport community a glimpse into the Coast Guard’s history, visitors can receive free tours of the historic tall ship from July 31 to Aug. 
2. 
“We tell the Coast Guard’s story,” Capt. 
Kristopher Ensley, commanding officer of Eagle, told The Journal. 
Measuring 295 feet long and 150 feet tall, the Coast Guard Cutter Eagle is the largest tall ship and the only active-duty sailing vessel in America’s military. 
Germany built the barque, a sailing vessel with at least three masts, in 1936 as one of the German navy’s three sail-training ships. 
After World War II, the United States took the ship as a war reparation and recommissioned it as the USCGC Eagle. 
The Eagle has since been based in New London, Connecticut, where it is used to train cadets attending the U.S. 
Coast Guard Academy for about six weeks as they learn to handle a ship dependent on environmental conditions. 
“They’re growing the future officers of America. 
They have to learn how to lead,” Ensley said. 
“They take all of the skills they learn in the classroom. 
 They put them into practice, and they develop into the officers we need.” 
In addition to leadership, training on a large, old sailing vessel with 6 miles of rigging and 22,000 square feet of sail teaches the cadets lessons in collaboration and teamwork. 
With the swabs’ summer boot camp in full swing, the Eagle is sailing along the East Coast, stopping in Newport. 
Visitors can visit the tall ship for free at Newport’s Louis L. 
Jagschitz State Pier No. 9, with no tickets required, where they will receive a tour from the swabs training on the ship. 
With these visits, the Eagle ensures the American public’s connection to the Coast Guard. 
The tall ship also serves as a foreign ambassador for the United States with stops at foreign ports. 
“It is a tool of peace,” Ensley said. 
Public tour hours: 
July 31  2 p.m. to 4 p.m. 
Aug. 1  10 a.m. to 7 p.m. 
Aug. 2  10 a.m. to 7 p.m. 
Military and first responder early access: 
Aug. 1  9 a.m. to 10 a.m. 
Aug. 2  9 a.m. to 10 a.m. 
When the Eagle leaves Newport, it will head to Greenport, New York, for a few days before heading back to its home port, New London, on Aug. 
14. 
This story has been updated with new photos. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.1%Bella DeCrescenzo: 1.5%The Providence Journal: 1.0%Confirmation Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 1.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.4%The Providence Journal: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Bella DeCrescenzo: 3.4%The Providence Journal: 3.3%Framing Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.4%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.6%The Providence Journal: 0.5%Status Quo Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Bella DeCrescenzo: 3.5%The Providence Journal: 0.9%Optimism Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 4.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Bella DeCrescenzo: 1.4%The Providence Journal: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Bella DeCrescenzo: 1.8%The Providence Journal: 1.4%Halo Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.4%The Providence Journal: 0.4%Recency Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 1.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 1.4%The Providence Journal: 1.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.4%The Providence Journal: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.8%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.7%The Providence Journal: 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.7%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.4%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.4%The Providence Journal: 1.6%Unattributed Quote1.4%This article: 1.4%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.4%The Providence Journal: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 5.5%Bella DeCrescenzo: 1.4%The Providence Journal: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice5.5%This article: 1.4%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.4%The Providence Journal: 0.2%Indoctrination1.4%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 0.0%The Providence Journal: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Bella DeCrescenzo: 3.5%The Providence Journal: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.0%

494 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker13%attributed speech429writer words
69%flagged-word coverage
65 attributed words100% of attributed speech39% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -16.1 ptsWriter: 16.1%Capt. Kristopher Ensley: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+10.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Capt. Kristopher Ensley: 10.8%10.8%Quote-first Misdirection+10.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Capt. Kristopher Ensley: 10.8%10.8%Indoctrination+10.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Capt. Kristopher Ensley: 10.8%10.8%Biased Writer Voice-6.3 ptsWriter: 6.3%Capt. Kristopher Ensley: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.