Author summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aubrey Howell results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Indoctrination , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 114 hits . Analysis detected 437 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (1,214 of 9,059 authors). This Aubrey Howell is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group. Aubrey Howell
Author details
Total words: 1,008
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.6% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst