Author summary
24% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Tobias results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 575 hits . Analysis detected 4,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,609 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (7,874 of 8,907 authors). This Andrew Tobias is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Andrew Tobias
Author details
Total words: 11,609
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst